NOTE 10— COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases

The Company currently occupies approximately 58,625 square feet of space used for warehousing and corporate offices. The annual rental for this space is $327,684, with a CPI increase not to exceed 15% in any consecutive five year period. The lease requires the Company to pay for additional expenses (Common Area Maintenance “CAM”), which includes real estate taxes, common area expense, utility expense, repair and maintenance expense and insurance expense. CAM was estimated at $150,000 for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2011.

The lease expires on May 31, 2012. The Company signed a new lease for the premises beginning June 1, 2012 and expiring May 31, 2022, with a renewal option for an additional five years. The new lease will increase the space that the Company will rent to a total of 81,000 square feet, and the annual rental for this space will be $486,012, with a CPI increase not to exceed 30% in any consecutive five year period. CAM was estimated at $207,250 per year for future years beginning June 1, 2012.

On September 26, 2007 the Company entered into an additional lease for warehouse space at 99 Murray Hill Parkway, East Rutherford, New Jersey for a term commencing November 1, 2007 and ending on May 31, 2012. The premise comprises 16,438 square feet of space for warehousing and storage. The annual rent is $123,285. The lease requires the Company to pay for additional expenses “Expense Rent” (Common Area Maintenance “CAM”), which includes real estate taxes, common area expense, certain utility expense, repair and maintenance expense and insurance expense. For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2011, CAM was $27,256. The Company has notified the landlord that it is not renewing the lease.

Rent expense for the years ended November 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $643,842, $631,139 and $618,311, respectively.

In addition, the Company has entered into various property and equipment operating leases with expiration dates ranging through November 2016.

Future commitments under non-cancelable operating lease agreements having a remaining term in excess of one year for each of the next five (5) years and in the aggregate are as follows:

Royalty Agreements

In 1986, the Company entered into a license agreement with Alleghany Pharmacal Corporation (the “Alleghany Pharmacal License”). The Alleghany Pharmacal License agreement provides that if, and when, in the aggregate, $9,000,000 in royalties had been paid thereunder, the royalty-rate for those products ‘charged’ at 6% would be reduced to 1%. The Company paid an aggregate of $9,000,000 in royalties to Alleghany as of April 2003. Commencing May 1, 2003, the license royalty was reduced to 1%. On March 25, 2011, the Company received a letter on behalf of Alleghany claiming that the Company was in default of the license agreement and that minimum annual royalties of $360,000 per year were due to Alleghany for fiscal 2003 and subsequent years. The Company had understood since the inception of the license agreement, that once the royalty rate was reduced to 1%, the minimum royalties would end. On July 8, 2011, the Company reached a settlement in which it agreed to a one-time payment to Alleghany of $600,000, an increase in the royalty rate from 1% to 2.5%, and a minimum annual royalty of $250,000 in order to settle this matter in full. Although management believed that the Company had a meritorious defense and could prevail in a court of law, it was decided to settle the dispute due to the risk of loss of two profitable core brands, “Nutra Nail” and “Hair Off”, and possible substantial liabilities that the Company estimated could be as high as $1,900,000. The Company incurred royalties totaling $285,568, and the one-time payment of $600,000 to Alleghany Pharmacal for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2011.

In May of 1998, the Company entered into a License Agreement with Solar Sense, Inc. for the marketing of sun care products under trademark names. The Company’s License Agreement with Solar Sense, Inc. is for the exclusive use of the trademark names “Solar Sense” and “Kids Sense”, in connection with the commercial exploitation of sun care products. The Solar Sense License requires the Company to pay a royalty of 5% on net sales of said licensed products until $1 million total royalties are paid, at which time the royalty rate will be reduced to 1% for a period of twenty-five years. The royalty incurred to Solar Sense, Inc. under the License Agreement was $67,136 for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2011.

In October of 1999, the Company entered into a License Agreement with The Nail Consultants, Ltd. for the use of an activator invented in connection with a method for applying a protective covering to fingernails. The Company’s License Agreement with The Nail Consultants, Ltd. was for the use of the method and its composition in a product kit packaged and marketed by CCA under its own name, “Nutra Nail Power Gel”. The Company was required to pay a royalty of 5% of net sales of all products sold under the license, by the Company. Effective December 1, 2010, the Company and The Nail Consultants, Ltd. agreed to cancel the License Agreement, and to increase the price that the Company pays for purchases of the activator from The Nail Consultants, Ltd. The royalties previously paid were reported as part of selling, general and administrative expenses on the financial statements. The increased cost of the activator is reflected on the financial statements for fiscal 2011 as part of cost of sales.

On May 18, 2004, The Company entered into a license agreement with Tea-Guard, Inc. to manufacture and distribute Mega -T Green Tea chewing gum and Mega -T Green Tea mints. The Company pays a royalty of 6% of net sales of all products sold under the license agreement. The license agreement was amended on March 31, 2009, granting the Company a non-exclusive license, with no minimum royalty required. The royalty rate of 6% of net sales will remain unchanged during the term, including any term renewals, of the amended license agreement. The Company incurred royalties of $19,614 to Tea-Guard, Inc. for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2011.

Effective November 3, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with Continental Quest Corp., to purchase certain trademarks and inventory relating to the Pain Bust R business for $285,106 paid at closing. In addition, the Company agreed to pay a royalty equal to 2% of net sales of all Pain Bust R products, which are topical analgesics, until an aggregate royalty of $1,250,000 is paid, at which time the royalty payments will cease. The Company incurred royalties of $14,743 to Continental Quest Corp. for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2011.

On March 22, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Joann Bradvica, granting the Company an exclusive license to manufacture and sell an Earlobe Patch Support for Earrings. The agreement provided for a royalty of 10% of net sales of the licensed product. A new agreement was entered into and effective on June 8, 2009 at the same royalty rate, and provides for a minimum royalty of $40,000 for annual periods beginning July 1, 2009, in order to maintain the license. The Company incurred royalties of $49,263 to Joann Bradvica for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2011.

The Company is not a party to any other license agreement that is currently material to its operations.

Consulting and Change of Control Agreements

The Company had executed Employment Contracts with David Edell, its former Chief Executive Officer and Ira Berman, former Corporate Secretary (the “Executives”). Mr. Edell remains as a director of the Company, and Mr. Berman was a director until August 4, 2011. The contracts for both are exactly the same. Employment under the contracts expired on December 31, 2010. Upon expiration of the employment term on December 31, 2010, the Executives became consultants to the Company for an ensuing five year term in accordance with the provisions of the agreement. For the consulting services provided, the Executives were each paid $645,935 in fiscal 2011, pursuant to the terms of their respective agreements, which provides for a consulting payment equal to fifty percent (50%) of their annual base salary plus bonus that they received in 2010. Under the provisions of the employment contracts, this amount will increase six (6%) percent per year for each successive year of the consulting term.

The Executives are also entitled to all benefits that they had previously received as employees for the consulting term. Upon the death of the Executives within the consulting period, the Company is obligated for two successive years to pay their respective estate an amount equal to their total compensation at that time.

On March 15, 2011, the compensation committee of the board of directors, acting on behalf of the Company, entered into a Change of Control Agreement (together, the “COC Agreements”) with each of Ira W. Berman and David Edell (the “Consultants”). Each of Mr. Berman and Mr. Edell was employed as a senior executive of the Company until December 31, 2010, at which point they each became consultants to the Company pursuant to the terms of their respective Amended and Restated Employment Agreements, as amended (each, an “Employment/Consulting Agreement).

The COC Agreements contained identical terms and conditions to each other and provide that, in the event of a Change of Control of the Company (as defined in the agreements), each of the Consultants is entitled to cease performing consulting services under his respective Employment/Consulting Agreement, and is entitled to certain payments from the Company, including a lump sum payment of all fees under the Employment/Consulting Agreement from the date of occurrence of the Change of Control through the end of the original term of that Employment/Consulting Agreement. In addition, upon on Change of Control, all of the Consultants’ unvested awards under the Company’s equity-based compensation plans, if any, automatically vest in full. If applicable, each of the Consultants would be entitled to a gross-up payment so that the after tax value of his payments and benefits under his COC Agreement would be the same as though no excise taxes applied to such payments or benefits.

Under the COC Agreements, each Consultant has agreed to a non-competition and non-solicitation restriction for two years, during which two-year period the Consultant is entitled to continued coverage under the Company’s group health, dental, long-term disability and life insurance plans. The foregoing summary of the COC Agreements are qualified in their entirety by the full text of the COC Agreements, copies of which may be found in Form 8-K, filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2011.

Employment Agreements

On March 21, 2011, the compensation committee of the board of directors, acting on behalf of the Company, entered into an Employment Agreement (each, an “Employment Agreement”) with each of Dunnan Edell, Stephen A. Heit, and Drew Edell (each, an “Executive”). Pursuant to their respective Employment Agreements, Mr. Dunnan Edell has been engaged to continue to serve as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Heit has been engaged to continue to serve as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Drew Edell

has been engaged to continue to serve as the Company’s Executive Vice President, Product Development and Production.

Mr. Dunnan Edell and Mr. Drew Edell are brothers and are the sons of David Edell, who is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and serves as a consultant to the Company.

Except as set forth below, the Employment Agreements contain substantially similar terms to each other. The term of employment under each of the Employment Agreements runs from March 21, 2011 through December 31, 2013, and will continue thereafter for successive one-year periods unless the Company or the Executive chooses not to renew the respective Employment Agreement.

Under the respective Employment Agreements, the base salaries of Mr. Dunnan Edell, Mr. Heit, and Mr. Drew Edell are $350,000, $250,000, and $275,000 per annum, respectively, and may be increased each year at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Executives are eligible to receive an annual performance-based bonus under their respective Employment Agreement, and are entitled to participate in Company equity compensation plans. In addition, each of the Executives will receive an automobile allowance, health insurance and certain other benefits.

In the event of termination of the respective Employment Agreement as a result of the disability or death of the Executive, the Executive (or his estate or beneficiaries) shall be entitled to receive all base salary and other benefits earned and accrued until such termination as well as a single-sum payment equal to the Executive’s base salary and a single-sum payment equal to the value of the highest bonus earned by the Executive in the one-year period preceding the date of termination pro-rated for the number of days served in that fiscal year.

If the Company terminates the Executive for Cause (as defined in the respective Employment Agreement), or the Executive terminates his employment in a manner not considered to be for Good Reason (as defined in the respective Employment Agreement), the Executive shall be entitled to receive all base salary and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of termination. If the Company terminates the Executive in a manner that is not for Cause or due to the Executive’s death or disability, the Executive terminates his employment for Good Reason, or the Company does not renew the Employment Agreement after December 31, 2013, the Executive shall be entitled to receive a single-sum payment equal to his unpaid base salary and other benefits earned and accrued prior to the date of termination and a single-sum payment of an amount equal to three times (a) the average of the base salary amounts paid to Executive over the three calendar years prior to the date of termination, (b) if less than three years have elapsed between March 21, 2011 and the date of termination, the highest base salary paid to the Executive in any calendar year prior to the date of termination, or (c) if less than twelve months have elapsed between March 21, 2011 and the date of termination, the highest base salary received in any month times twelve. In addition, each Executive is entitled to the same benefits if the Executive terminates his employment with the Company in connection with a Change of Control (as defined in their respective Employment Agreements).

Under the Employment Agreements, each Executive has agreed to non-competition restrictions for a period of six months following the end of the term of his Employment Agreement, during which period the Executive will be paid an amount equal to his base salary for a period of six months, and an amount equal to the pro rata share of any bonus attributable to the portion of the year completed prior to the date of termination. The Executives have also agreed to confidentiality and non-solicitation restrictions under the Employment Agreements.

The foregoing summary of the Employment Agreements are qualified in their entirety by the full text of the Employment Agreements, copies of which may be found in Form 8-K that was filed by Company on March 21, 2011 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Company also entered into an Employment Agreement with another Company executive, who is not a “named executive officer” within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and related regulations. The additional Employment Agreement referred to in the preceding sentence contains substantially similar terms as the Employment Agreements discussed above, except that the employee’s base salary is $135,000 per annum.

As a result of the execution of the Employment Agreements referred to above, the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, by and between Mr. Dunnan Edell and the Company, effective as of December 1, 2002 and amended on February 10, 2007 and May 17, 2007, has been terminated. Similarly, as a result of the execution of the Employment Agreement referred to above, the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, by and between Mr. Drew Edell and the Company, effective as of December 1, 2002 and amended on February 10, 2007 and May 17, 2007, has also been terminated.

Equity Plans

On June 15, 2005, the shareholders approved an amended and Restated Stock Option Plan amending the 2003 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan authorizes the issuance of up to one million shares of common stock (subject to customary adjustments set forth in the plan) pursuant to equity awards, which may take the form of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options restricted shares, stock appreciation rights and/or performance shares. There are no grants outstanding as of November 30, 2011, and no such grants were issued in fiscal 2011.

Collective Bargaining Agreement

The Company signed a new collective bargaining agreement with Local 108, L.I.U. of N.A., AFL-CIO that became effective January 1, 2012. The new agreement is effective for a three year term expiring December 31, 2014. Other than standard wage, holiday, vacation and sick day provisions, the agreement calls for CCA to contribute to the Recycling and General Industrial Union Local 108 Welfare Fund (“Welfare Fund”) certain benefit costs. The Welfare Fund provides medical, dental and life insurance for the Company’s employees covered under the collective bargaining agreement. This agreement pertains to 30% of the CCA labor force.

Litigation

On September 27, 2011, a lawsuit, entitled Shirilla v. CCA Industries, Inc., was instituted against the Company in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. The plaintiff named in the complaint relating to the lawsuit seeks to have the case certified as a class action. The complaint alleged unfair or deceptive business practices by the Company and asserted that the Company made false and misleading claims about its “Mega-T” product line in violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act and the California Business and Professions Code. The complaint stated that the plaintiff was seeking an injunction and other equitable remedies, and restitution, disgorgement and unspecified monetary damages and expenses. The Company denied the allegations of wrongdoing and liability with regard to its advertising and other business practices. Moreover, the Company believed that the claims asserted in the Shirilla matter were the same as or similar to those asserted in the class action Wally v. CCA Industries, Inc., which was filed in the same court in 2009 and was settled, without admission of any liability or allegations made in the case, in 2010. The court-approved settlement in Wally dismissed all claims that were made, or could have been made, in the case by members of the plaintiff class. The Sharilla case was moved to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On January 12, 2012, plaintiff’s counsel notified the Company’s attorney that they were seeking to dismiss the case, with prejudice. The case was subsequently dismissed by the United States District Court, and the matter is now closed.

Dividends and Capital Transactions

On December 21, 2009, the board of directors declared a $0.07 per share dividend for the first quarter ended February 28, 2010. The dividend was payable to all shareholders of record as of February 1, 2010 and was paid on March 1, 2010. On February 23, 2010, the Board of Directors declared a $0.07 per share dividend for the second quarter ended May 31, 2010. The dividend was payable to all shareholders of record on May 3, 2010 and was paid on June 3, 2010. On May 28, 2010, the Board of Directors declared a $0.07 per share dividend for the third quarter ended August 31, 2010. The dividend was payable to all shareholders of record on August 2, 2010 and was paid on September 2, 2010. On October 13, 2010, the Board of Directors declared a $0.07 dividend for the fourth quarter ending November 30, 2010. The dividend was payable to all shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 1, 2010, and was paid on December 1, 2010.

On January 28, 2011, the board of directors declared a $0.07 per share dividend for the first quarter ended February 28, 2011. The dividend was payable to all shareholders of record as of February 10, 2011 and was paid on March 10, 2011.

On February 9, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a dividend, payable to holders of record as of the close of business on February 22, 2011 of one preferred stock purchase right (a Right) for each outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and of Class

A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (together, the Common Stock). In addition, the Company will issue one Right with each new share of Common Stock issued. In connection therewith, on February 9, 2011, the Company entered into a Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement (as amended from time to time, the Rights Agreement) with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC, as Rights Agent, which has a term of one year, unless extended by the Rights Committee and the Board of Directors in accordance with the terms of the Rights Agreement. The Rights will initially trade with and be inseparable from our Common Stock and will not be evidenced by separate certificates unless they become exercisable. Each Right entitles its holder to purchase from the Company one-hundredth of a share of participating preferred stock having economic and voting terms similar to the Common Stock at an exercise price of $18 per Right, subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Rights Agreement, once the Rights become exercisable. Prior to exercise, a Right does not give its holder any dividend, voting or liquidation rights. Under the Rights Agreement, the Rights become exercisable if any person or group acquires 20% or more of the Common Stock or, in the case of any person or group that owned 20% or more of the Common Stock as of February 9, 2011, upon the acquisition of any additional shares by such person or group. The Company, its subsidiaries, employee benefit plans of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and any entity holding Common Stock for or pursuant to the terms of any such plan are excepted. Upon exercise of the Right in accordance with the Rights Agreement, the holder would be able to purchase a number of shares of Common Stock from the Company having an aggregate market price (as defined in the Rights Agreement) equal to twice the then-current exercise price for an amount in cash equal to the then-current exercise price. In addition, the Company may, in certain circumstances and pursuant to the terms of the Rights Agreement, exchange the Rights for one share of Common Stock or an equivalent security for each Right or, alternatively, redeem the Rights for $0.001 per Right. The Rights will not prevent a takeover of our Company, but may cause substantial dilution to a person that acquires 20% or more of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company has allowed the Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement to expire.

On February 28, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a $0.07 per share dividend for the second quarter ended May 31, 2011. The dividend was payable to all shareholders of record as of May 2, 2011, and was paid on June 2, 2011.

On July 15, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a $0.07 per share dividend for the third quarter ended August 31, 2011. The dividend was payable to all shareholders of record as of August 2, 2011, and was paid on September 2, 2011.

On October 10, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a $0.07 per share dividend for the fourth quarter ending November 30, 2011, payable to all shareholders as of November 1, 2011 and was paid on December 2, 2011.